Very interesting, I would instead have a suggestion for a much more solid approach in my opinion, since yours is great for taxiing takeoffs but not for hand launches, which is often not necessarily the direction of the runway.
The automatism I propose requires a very trivial thing in Mission Planner, then Ardupilot on that can do all the reasoning for a land without doing complex missions.
This a simple emergency LAND mission that I often use with some of my fpv planes.
The operation is simple, the automatic manual launch that gives me time to switch to Loiter or force an RTL once the takeoff has happened correctly (so during the LOITER_TIME), gives me time to put on goggles and then switch to other flight modes and proceed.
I also set an alternate home a short distance away because I don't want it to loiter over our heads in an emergency.
In case of failsafe AUTO intervenes, then the plane goes back to the LOITER_TIME event that I had not let it finish and shortly thereafter executes the circuit for LAND.
During that LOITER_TIME if I have the tx out I have time to decide whether to have it continue or maybe intervene in telemetry in some other way, a system that has been tried hundreds of times before.

Instead, here is what I propose, in my opinion the most logical and hyper simple: if there was the possibility in Ardupilot to fix two points on the runway, to indicate LR of the correct axis would be more than enough to tell Ardupilot to use that line to perform any kind of LAND, so something like this.

In this very simple approach Ardupilot knows of the runway the direction, the center and the correct length, so he knows that that is the runway in all its useful aspects.
Then 2 coordinates (latitude and longitude for each of the two points) that can be entered perhaps from mission planning or with parameters would suffice.
This simple line would be enough to then do any kind of automated LAND developed for this approach, without perhaps having to resort to complex planning on Mission Planner.
This is an aviation approach already known for planes performing ILS or any other instrumental approaches to the runway, and has been using Micropilot for at least a decade.
These two points are enough to allow AUTOLAND to make no mistake.
Certainly your PR is more immediate but in my opinion less secure in many contexts, of course definitely better that than nothing but supplementing it with this would make it infallible imho.

@robustini many people never use MP after initial setup and arent comfortable with mission planning....I never use missions other than autotakeoff/do-land-start/landing sequence with my mission selector app to select land direction for my field based on wind direction....or my UniversalAutoLand lua when travelling to other locations

this is the C++ implementation of my UniversalAutoLand lua script which I use when traveling and just stop at a location and fly...no laptop used..

Should this be disabling fences (autoenabled, and floor) when doing a landing?

It does a NAV_LAND....so whatever it does or does not